Neighbors with multiple dogs concern Dawson residents
Some Dawson residents complained to borough council Monday night about neighbors with multiple dogs who do not clean up after them.
Residents talked about outside stench, barking and the overall condition of properties with many dogs.
“I sympathize completely, but I am not really sure what we can do about it,” Councilman Robert Bibby said.
Residents were told to contact the Uniontown barracks of the Pennsylvania State Police and ask for the officer in charge of dog and animal issues.
“They have an officer there who is assigned to dog calls,” Dawson Mayor Carol Capella said.
Council reminded residents that dog licenses are available at the post office and at the Brownfield Community Center.
Council decided to have community cleanup from May 1 through May 4.
“We're not going to have a Dumpster, but this will be for cleanup in general,” Council President Patty Lint said, adding that garbage bags and gloves will be available at the borough building for those who need them.
Capella asked council to allow local youth to again plant flowers around the borough building and was granted permission.
Dawson Volunteer Fire Department Chief Billy Colbert asked council if they were any closer to a decision regarding the fire department's request to erect a new fire hall on a lot owned by the borough.
“We were just wondering were you stood on it,” Colbert said. “We'd really like to be in our new hall for our next banquet.”
Lint told Colbert that the council had been discussing the topic and would inform the department soon of its decision.
Council set Dawson Days for June 1 and 2.
Marilyn Forbes is a freelance writer.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.