New York man gets up to 30-year prison sentence for Redstone bank robbery
A New York man convicted of robbing a Fayette County bank at gunpoint in 2011 will serve up to 30 years in prison.
Jerod “New York” Jackson, 24, whose last known address was Brooklyn, was convicted of multiple counts of theft, robbery, simple assault and reckless endangerment following a March trial.
State police said Jackson was carrying a black handgun when he entered the Parkvale Bank along Route 40 in Redstone on Aug. 25, 2011, and demanded money.
According to court records, numerous bank employees immediately realized a robbery was imminent and pressed security alert buttons.
Records show Jackson pointed the weapon at several tellers, ordering them to fill a bag with cash. He escaped with more than $11,000, police said.
“Not only did (Jackson) threaten people with a firearm, he put it directly to (a bank employee's) head when committing the robbery,” Senior Judge Ralph Warman said on Monday.
“One victim was unable to return to work. She (remains) in counseling,” Warman said.
“She was 35 weeks pregnant when he put a gun to her head,” said Assistant District Attorney Michelle Kelley.
“There is no question, based on testimony we had at trial, (Jackson) did have a weapon during the commission of this crime,” Warman said.
He sentenced Jackson to serve five to 20 years for one count of robbery with threat of immediate serious injury and a consecutive term of five to 10 years for an identical charge.
Jackson will be taken to SCI Pittsburgh and must serve a minimum of 10 years before being considered for parole.
Warman imposed no further penalty for the remaining charges.
Mary Pickels is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-836-5401 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.