Share This Page

Pair with ties to Belle Vernon caught in Calif.

| Thursday, April 11, 2013, 12:01 a.m.
Kayla Creamer of Moultrie, Ga.
Frank Gillon Jr. of Cathedral, Calif.

Fugitives from the law can run as far as California, said Southwest Regional Police Chief John Dale Hartman, but they will be caught.

With information provided by the Southwest Regional Police Department, the U.S. Marshals Service arrested fugitives Frank Gillon Jr., 24, of Yuciapa, Calif., and Kayla Kathleen Creamer, 28, of Moultrie, Ga., on Tuesday at a residence near Riverside, Calif.

Both were wanted on felony warrants for endangering the welfare of a child and drug violations. Gillon also was wanted for firearm violations related to an incident in Belle Vernon on Aug. 7, according to police.

Gillon is charged with possession of a firearm with an altered or obliterated serial number, endangering the welfare of children, possession of a prohibited offensive weapon, possession of a small amount of marijuana, possession of drug paraphernalia and cruelty to animals.

Creamer is charged with endangering the welfare of children, possession of a small amount of marijuana and cruelty to animals.

The couple's alleged stash of marijuana, drug paraphernalia, ammunition, a sawed-off shotgun and a 20-gauge shotgun were found in a car and residence in Belle Vernon after police received a call about three pit bulls left in a hot car.

Gillon, Creamer and Creamer's young son were staying with a friend on Market Street at the time, police said. Hartman said Gillon had transported the shotgun across the country, and it was stored next to a child's toy box at the Belle Vernon home.

Gillon and Creamer are in Riverside County Jail in California awaiting extradition to Pennsylvania.

Hartman said he did not know how long extradition could take.

“The moral of this tale is, it's not good to run from the law,” Hartman said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.