Ex-Connellsville official McSheffery heads Cal U campus police staff
Cal U Police Chief Ed McSheffery
California University of Pennsylvania's new director and chief of campus police is no stranger to Connellsville residents.
Edward McSheffery, a former chief of the Connellsville Police Department, began his duties this month.
He had been assistant director of safety and security at Community College of Allegheny County and a sergeant and patrol shift leader at Carnegie Mellon University, both in Pittsburgh.
McSheffery's background includes training in hostage negotiations and criminal sexuality with the FBI; completed courses in auto theft, wiretapping and electronic surveillance with the state police; and certification as a firearms and Taser instructor.
He has bachelor's degree in administration of justice from Penn State University. And he is on track to complete a master's degree in applied criminology this summer at California University of Pennsylvania. He has 23 years of experience in law enforcement.
“Here at Cal U, that means getting to know the employees, the faculty and the students on campus,” McSheffery said. “Our police department also has a lot of interaction with borough police officers and the residents of the town. We're here to enforce the law, but our primary purpose is to create a safe and secure campus environment.”
Connellsville police Chief James Capitos said McSheffery left his position with the department in September 2010. According to information from Cal U, McSheffery served as chief for three years in the city.
Karl Polacek is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at email@example.com or 724-626-3538.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.