Share This Page

Connellsville Township home destroyed by fire

| Monday, April 29, 2013, 5:57 p.m.
Submitted
Firemen battled a blaze at 215 Demuth Road in Connellsville Township, approximately 10:26 p.m. Saturday but were unable to save the structure. The family escaped unharmed. A family pet perished, however. Saturday, April 27, 2013.
Evan R. Sanders | Daily Courier
The residence at 215 Demuth Road, Connellsville Township, was destroyed by fire on Saturday, April 27, 2013.

A Connellsville Township family is homeless as a result of a fire that destroyed their home on Saturday night.

John and Susan Cole and their family were able to escape the fire, Connellsville Township Assistant Chief Robert Leiberger Jr. said, but the family's 4-year-old Chesapeake Bay retriever died in the blaze.

At 10:26 p.m., Connellsville Township Volunteer Fire Department was called to assist at a fire on First Street in Vanderbilt. Fire personnel said that before firefighters left the station, the company was called to the structure fire at 215 Demuth Road.

Connellsville Township firefighters were assisted at the scene by the Bullskin, New Haven, Everson and South Connellsville companies.

Leiberger said the cause of the fire is undetermined. A state police fire marshal has been called to investigate. The fire is not suspicious, Leiberger said.

Fayette EMS was on the scene. Perry Township and Dunbar fire companies were on standby. No injuries were reported at the scene.

Karl Polacek is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at kpolacek@tribweb.com or 724-626-3538.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.