Fayette County man accused of receiving stolen property, multiple drug offenses
A Fayette County man was charged with receiving stolen property and numerous drug offenses following a state police search of his German Township residence last month.
David Sumpter, 34, of Shimko Hollow Road was charged on April 9, according to an affidavit of probable cause filed with District Judge Randy Abraham.
Police who were investigating a report of a domestic incident at Sumpter's home on that date noticed a controlled substance without a valid prescription, drug paraphernalia and suspected heroin in plain view.
According to Trooper Christina Marth, the items were spotted in a detached garage and were seized.
District Judge Michael Metros issued a search warrant for the main house, garage, three storage buildings, a shed, a trailer and vehicles on the property.
Troopers who arrived to serve the search warrant found Sumpter lying on a couch in the garage.
The search turned up $9,553, three handguns — one had been reported stolen in 2012 — about 3 pounds of marijuana, a scale, a pipe, plastic bags and gloves, and six Oxycodone pills.
A box used to ship the marijuana bore a shipping label with Sumpter's name and address, police said.
A stolen ATV was found on the property, police reported.
Charges against Sumpter include one felony count of manufacture, delivery or possession and four counts of use/possession of drug paraphernalia.
Free on $20,000 bond, Sumpter faces a preliminary hearing before Abraham on Tuesday.
Mary Pickels is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-836-5401 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.