ShareThis Page

Lincoln gets Democratic nod in Connellsville mayoral primary

| Wednesday, May 22, 2013, 2:21 a.m.
Connellsville mayoral candidate Greg Lincoln celebrates his primary victory on Tuesday night with his wife, Leigh Ann Lincoln; daughter, Amelia Lincoln; and friends at his headquarters.

Marilyn Forbes | for the Daily Courier
Connellsville mayoral candidate Greg Lincoln celebrates his primary victory on Tuesday night with his wife, Leigh Ann Lincoln; daughter, Amelia Lincoln; and friends at his headquarters. 5/21/13

The mayor's race for Connellsville in Tuesday's primary ended with the incumbent mayor losing out to a newcomer by a few percentage points.

Greg Lincoln won on the Democratic ticket, receiving 47 percent of the vote, defeating two opposing candidates.

Lincoln said that it was a rough couple of months leading up to the election, but there wasn't anything that he would do differently.

“I think that I ran a good campaign and I had a lot of good people supporting me,” Lincoln said, adding that he spent election day canvassing the city and talking to voters. “We gave it 100 percent, and I worked every ward in the city. I feel that I reached every person in the city in some way.”

Lincoln said that win or lose, he was glad he decided to run to try to make a change in the city and he is thankful for the support of those who believed in him and those who voted for him.

“I can't thank the people who supported me enough,” Lincoln said. “I thank those who supported me and I thank the people of Connellsville for taking a chance on me and believing in me and for giving me the chance to get the city back on track.”

Lincoln said after working so hard and so long on his campaign, it's time for a little rest.

“I'll be sleeping in tomorrow,” Lincoln laughed. “I need a day off.”

Connellsville Mayor Charles Matthews received 44 percent of the vote. He said he could have campaigned a little harder and organized a little better, but he was proud that he ran his campaign on his record of not raising taxes and didn't run a dirty campaign.

“I didn't enjoy the low points of the campaign,” he said, adding that the other candidates had no experience on council and didn't know about arbitration and police contracts when it comes to cutting costs in the city's budget. “People say what they want to say without facts.”

Although he didn't win the primary, Matthews said he's run and lost in other elections, but he did it for the city.

“I just enjoyed doing it, serving the community,” Matthews said. “It's just another election.”

First-time candidate Joshua DeWitt, who said he was taking people back and forth to the polls for most of the day and visited other polling locations, received 9 percent of the vote.

“It is what it is,” he said. “I can't change it. That's why people have the right to vote.”

DeWitt said he remained undeterred during the campaign. He said one of the highlights was meeting people at the candidates' forum held in April and he is not discouraged to keep going.

“I'm not giving up,” DeWitt said. “I will run for something else.”

No Republicans ran in the mayoral primary.

Running for two, four-year seats on Connellsville City Council were Democrat incumbent Tom Karpiak, who ran unopposed and received 100 percent of the vote, and Aaron Zolbrod, a newcomer on the Republican ticket. The two would run unopposed in the general election unless they are challenged by a write-in campaign.

All results are unofficial.

Mark Hofmann is a staff writer with Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-626-3539

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.