Greensburg man admits to having, intending to share pot
A Greensburg man pulled over for a traffic stop submitted a guilty plea on Wednesday to charges of drug possession and delivery in Fayette County.
Wesley Middleton, 35, formerly of Uniontown, could face up to six years in prison and a maximum fine of $20,000.
Middleton entered a general plea, meaning there was no agreement on the terms of his sentence.
According to Assistant District Attorney Doug Sepic, tinted windows led state police to stop Middleton's vehicle on March 7, 2012.
A search of his vehicle turned up 35.8 grams of marijuana, Judge Nancy Vernon said on Wednesday.
Middleton was charged with possession with intent to deliver and possession.
Middleton, represented by Pittsburgh attorney Blaine Jones, had been scheduled for a nonjury trial, prior to deciding to enter a plea.
Questioned by Vernon, Middleton acknowledged that he had the marijuana in a backpack in his car when he was stopped.
“It was for my own personal use,” he said.
When Vernon explained that possession with intent to deliver could include intent to sell or to share, Middleton added that he intended “to share” the marijuana.
The possession with intent to deliver charge is a felony and carries a maximum fine of five years in jail and a potential fine of $15,000.
Possession is a misdemeanor carrying a potential one-year prison sentence and a possible $5,000 fine.
Police found a .40-caliber pistol and a loaded AK-47 rifle in Middleton's vehicle, Sepic said.
The pistol was not concealed and Middleton had the necessary permits, he said.
Middleton remains free on $10,000 bail. He will be sentenced before Vernon on July 29.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.