Employee punched during store robbery attempt in North Union
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Wednesday, June 26, 2013, 12:01 a.m.
State police said a Uniontown man was assaulted late Monday by a gun-wielding man who demanded money.
The 41-year-old employee of Dollar General was in the store parking lot along North Gallatin Avenue in North Union collecting carts when a black male approached him from behind at 9:15 p.m. and placed a silver handgun to the back of his neck.
The suspect took the employee inside the store at gunpoint and then punched him in the face when the cash register would not open, according to a news release. The suspect fled, and police said he may have robbed a Uniontown restaurant shortly after.
At 10:16 p.m. Monday, Uniontown City police were dispatched to Potters Restaurant on Morgantown Street for a reported robbery. Police said a man entered a bar area and pointed a silver handgun at patrons. Witnesses said the suspect fired a shot into the ceiling and took money from a cash register and numerous patrons before running out.
The suspect in the Dollar General incident was described as approximately 6 feet tall with a medium build. Police said he was wearing a dark facial covering, a dark blue jacket, dark pants and black gloves.
Patrons at Potters Restaurant described the suspect as a black, approximately 30 years old, wearing dark clothing and a clear mask.
Anyone with information is asked to telephone state police in Uniontown at 724-439-7111.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Connellsville area benefits from tourism grant program
- $1.3M equipment, which lowers voltage, leaves Connellsville for Charleroi
- Connellsville police hitting the streets on foot and bikes
- Connellsville’s new curfew —with stiffer penalties — to begin on April 26
- Everson council to meet on Monday
- Fayette County candy stores say public sweet on jelly beans as well as chocolate
- No date set for closing on proposed hotel property in Connellsville
- Connellsville not yet worried about possible CDBG cuts
- Celebrate National Library Month with sweet contest in Connellsville
- Brush fire season keeps Fayette firefighters busy
- Attorney says Fayette County officials’ policy on recording goes against state law