World War II vets invited to share stories during Connellsville library program
July might seem like an odd time of the year to think about Pearl Harbor and the entry of the United States into World War II, but Shirley Rosenberger, who works in programming and circulation at the Carnegie Free Library in Connellsville, said the idea of the theme for an adult reading club goes well with the Fourth of July holiday.
“World War II brought about changes in so many ways,” she said. Rosenberger said veterans of World War II were viewed “as heroes,” differently from those of, for example, Vietnam.
On Saturday, beginning at noon, the library's adult reading club will review readings about the war, the people who fought and the changes that happened because of the war.
Several World War II veterans are expected to attend to discuss their perspectives on the war.
The session is open to the public. Rosenberger encourages participation.
“World War II brought about changes in so many different ways,” she said. “Women joined the workforce (Rosie the Riveter), and new technology (atom bomb).”
Rosenberger said talks by the veterans could give those who attend the perspectives of the World War II veterans when they joined the military and their perspectives when they came home.
She is inviting any World War II veterans to join in the program on Saturday, as well as members of the public.
The program should run two hours but could go over.
Rosenberger said the library will be open until 5 p.m.
Karl Polacek is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at email@example.com or 724-626-3538.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.