Wife: Husband's Washington Twp. arson accusations 'inflated'
A Washington Township man remained in jail in Fayette County on Sunday on arson charges in connection with a fire at his residence.
The suspect, James P. McGavitt Jr., 37, was charged by Washington Township police with arson, reckless endangerment of an inhabited building, risking a catastrophe, recklessly endangering another person and disorderly conduct.
McGavitt was arraigned before Belle Vernon District Judge Jesse Cramer and placed in the Fayette County Jail in lieu of $40,000 bond. McGavitt faces a preliminary hearing on Friday before Cramer.
McGavitt's wife, Georgette, said on Sunday that the fire that started on Saturday afternoon outside the garage door of their Hillman Street residence was quickly extinguished and did not cause any damage.
McGavitt said the charges filed against her husband “are inflated.” Although her husband is charged with recklessly endangering another person, Georgette McGavitt said no one was in danger of being hurt by the fire.
Washington Township police Officer John M. McLaughlin Jr., who filed charges against McGavitt, could not be reached for comment on Sunday.
The Washington Township Fire Department was not dispatched to the fire, she said.
Georgette McGavitt declined to comment on how the fire was started or how it was extinguished.
Neither fire Chief Robert Bennett nor Charles Horan, president of the fire department, could be reached for comment on Sunday.
Joe Napsha is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-836-5252 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.