Plans for new Perry Township building in talks
Perry Township supervisors will meet with McMillen Engineering and a construction manager next week to discuss plans to construct a township building behind the current 100-year-old structure.
“We've outgrown our current building, and we're trying to find out what we can afford if we construct a new office building and garage,” said township Supervisor Janet Galla. “We're trying to figure out what we want and what we can afford.”
Chairman A.J. Boni said the township needs to construct a new building because the current structure is in “pretty bad shape.”
“We're going to meet with construction managers that could possibly oversee the work,” Boni said. “We're also meeting with McMillen Engineering to help us to decide what is needed and what we can afford.”
The supervisors said they have no idea how much it will cost to construct a building.
The current building is part of the historic Perry Foundry, which was built more than a century ago, Boni said.
“The township bought the building in the later 1950s or early 1960s and converted it into a township building,” he said.
About three or four years ago, Boni said the township purchased four acres of land behind the building at an approximate cost of $35,000.
Galla said the property was taken by eminent domain, and the former structure that was declared unsafe was demolished.
Boni said the township plans to construct its building on that site.
In other business, the supervisors:
• Announced that the Layton Bridge will be closed 24 hours a day from July 7 to July 10.
• Notified the public that seal coating work is expected to begin Monday on Memorial Drive. Motorists should expect traffic delays during the road project.
• Scheduled a meeting with PennVEST to discuss a proposed water-line extension project on Banning Road.
Cindy Ekas is a freelance writer.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.