In aftermath of flooding, Connellsville Township hoping for federal, state aid
Representatives from the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency visited Connellsville Township earlier this week to assess recent flood damage.
Robert Leiberger Sr., the township's Emergency Management Agency (EMA) coordinator, told supervisors Thursday night that PEMA officials checked flood damage at 12 sites that occurred on July 2.
“PEMA visited those sites, and the township requested reimbursement for state and federal aid to help recover some of the funding that was used to respond to the flood,” Leiberger said. “We're not sure if we will be eligible for reimbursement, but we're going to see what happens.”
Severe flooding occurred on July 2 in the township where basements were flooding because storm drains became clogged and could not handle the excess water from heavy downpours.
“We want to thank EMA and the fire department for everything they did to help us with the damage after the flood,” Supervisor Chairman Tom Cesario said. “They did a great job, and we really appreciate everything they did in an emergency situation.”
Cesario said the township declared a state of emergency and notified PEMA and FEMA for assistance.
Since the flood waters have subsided, the supervisors voted to lift the state of emergency.
“We need to get back to normal,” Supervisor Robert Carson said. “We no longer need a state of emergency.”
If a similar situation occurs in the future, Cesario encouraged township residents who are in good health to help the fire department, emergency management officials and supervisors to clean clogged drains.
“We would really appreciate it if the residents could pitch in and help us the next time,” he said. “We just can't do everything that is needed in a situation like that.”
Cindy Ekas is a freelance writer.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.