City delays CDBG hearing
A public hearing to discuss how Community Development Block Grant money will be spent in Connellsville has been delayed.
The meeting was expected to take place at 6 p.m. Wednesday, before the Connellsville City Council meeting, but Michael Edwards, executive director of the Connellsville Redevelopment Authority, informed board members Tuesday evening that the hearing has been postponed.
“The public hearing has been canceled because the city has not decided how it wants to spend the money,” Edwards said. “The city has to inform the public of what it plans to do with the money so the public has a chance to make comments and suggestions. The city has not decided which projects it plans to do.”
Edwards said CDBG funding will be delayed because state money recently was released for disaster relief that occurred in 2011.
He explained that 38 counties in Pennsylvania will qualify for disaster relief because two storms caused significant damage in September 2011.
“The disaster relief funding has just been released,” Edwards said. “The disaster relief money is two years old. The counties that received damage in those storms haven't received any money yet. I anticipate that the CDBG money for Connellsville will be delayed even longer because of the delay in the disaster relief money.”
The state also has not yet released CDBG grant applications for 2013, Edwards said.
“We don't even have the grant applications yet for 2013,” he said. “We're probably not going to see any money until the spring of 2014.”
In other business, Edwards said he plans to meet this week with Keith Cochran of Cochran & Associates of Pittsburgh, a company that specializes in historical properties, to discuss plans to restore Connellsville's Carnegie Free Library.
“From what I understand, they plan to replace the roof, windows and lighting, but the $30,000 we are giving them in CDBG money will only cover the cost of the roof,” he said.
Edwards said the Carnegie Library recently received $150,000 in state funding for restoration work. The library received money from a private foundation that could be used as matching funds.
“I just want to make sure that they understand that the CDBG money has to go toward the roof,” he said.
Edwards told authority members he had no update on the Aaron's Building.
Terry “Tuffy” Shallenberger approached city council about the possibility of purchasing the historic building at the corner of Pittsburgh and Apple streets that had been slated for demolition.
“I heard that Tuffy has been negotiating with the adjacent property owners,” Edwards said. “Tuffy hasn't announced what he plans to do with the building yet. We're just waiting to see what city council does.”
Cindy Ekas is a contributing writer.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.