ShareThis Page

$24K prison-study deal creates conflict on Fayette commission

| Wednesday, July 17, 2013, 12:01 a.m.

Two Fayette County commissioners on Tuesday approved a $24,000 no-bid contract to an architectural and engineering team for a prison-needs assessment.

The approval by commissioners Al Ambrosini and Vincent Zapotosky prompted the third commissioner, Angela Zimmerlink, to question both the selection process and the item's last-minute addition to the board's agenda for a public meeting.

At the outset of Tuesday's meeting, Ambrosini amended the agenda to include approval of the contract with Sleighter Engineering of Uniontown and Crabtree, Rohrbaugh & Associates Architects of Mechaniscburg.

He and Zapotosky later voted in favor of awarding the contract, with Zimmerlink dissenting.

Ambrosini said a prison working group that has been exploring the possibility of a building a new prison to replace the county's 124-year-old jail recommended the team for the study. Because the team is providing a professional service, state law does not require the county to seek bids for the $24,000 study, he said.

The team will take two months to prepare a report detailing the county's options and costs associated with addressing various problems at the jail, Ambrosini said, including overcrowding and inadequate facilities.

It will place a per-inmate cost on the county's options, which will range from making no changes to building a new prison, said Controller Sean Lally.

“This step we're taking here today is certainly an important step,” Ambrosini said. “But the important part of this step is to provide due diligence.”

Although the county was not required to obtain cost comparisons from other firms, Zimmerlink said commissioners have “no excuse” for failing to solicit other proposals.

“The question is, did the commissioners do a selective process to arrive at the best possible price for these services?” Zimmerlink said. “The answer is no.”

She questioned the item's last-minute addition to the agenda. She noted that most items are placed on the agenda a week in advance, giving residents prior notice of the board's intentions so they can comment prior to a vote.

Ambrosini said he did not know until after last week's agenda meeting that the firm had put together a proposal.

He said he motioned for the last-minute addition because finding a solution for the prison's problems is “time-sensitive.”

“Every month we delay finding our solution ... it's going to cost the taxpayers $100,000,” Ambrosini said.

According to Lally, the county is on track to spend $1.5 million this year to house inmates in other counties because of overcrowding at the aging prison in Uniontown. He previously advised the board that current low interest rates on municipal bonds could go up at any time.

Zapotosky said the prison “clearly has a population issue” that must be addressed. In addition, he said various other fixes are needed because of its antiquated facilities.

Liz Zemba is a reporter for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-601-2166 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.