Judge reverses work release order for former prison employee
A Fayette County woman who smuggled cellphones, marijuana and other contraband to inmates in a state prison will not be released to go to work while serving a jail term.
Senior Judge Gerald R. Solomon this week set aside an earlier order in which he had allowed Leann Cellurale, 36, of Dunbar Township to participate in a work-release program as part of her sentence on contraband charges.
Cellurale was sentenced on Aug. 13 to three to 23 months in the State Correctional Institute at Muncy in Lycoming County as a result of pleading guilty to possession with intent to deliver contraband, possession and two misdemeanor counts of contraband.
Cellurale worked in the dietary department of the State Correctional Institution at Fayette, where she provided inmates with forbidden items, including marijuana, phones, hair dye, Muslim oil and incense, according to police.
At the request of defense attorney Jeremy Davis, Solomon modified the sentence on Aug. 20 to allow Cellurale to serve her time in the prison in Greene County and participate in its work-release program at the family-owned Cellurale Garden Center in Dunbar Township.
Fayette's jail does not have work release. Cellurale had agreed to pay all costs for her to be incarcerated in Greene.
On Tuesday, Solomon set aside the allowance for work release because District Attorney Jack Heneks objected to it. Heneks contended that work release was too light for a prison smuggler.
Solomon's order noted that he pulled permission for work release because Cellurale's plea bargain stipulated that she not be allowed to participate.
Liz Zemba is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-601-2166 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.