Fayette cemetery spared, must pay delinquent taxes
A Fayette County cemetery has been removed from a pending tax sale, but it remains responsible for $3,945 in back taxes, according to county tax officials.
Oak Grove Cemetery on McClellendtown Road in South Union was to be sold at Monday's tax sale, but it was pulled from the sale after a Sept. 5 hearing before the Fayette County Tax Assessment Appeals Board, said Bill Lukach, chief assessor for the county.
Lukach said the cemetery was able to show that when it was established in 1849, the state Legislature granted its tax-exempt status.
In addition, Lukach said, nonprofit or religious cemeteries are not taxed.
Lukach said the 15-acre cemetery is nearly full, and he believes that it is cared for by volunteers.
He said the appeals board granted it tax-exempt status, but that does not start until 2014.
“It won't take effect until 2014, so they would still be liable (for back taxes),” Lukach said.
The $3,945 in taxes and penalties are due for the 2011 and 2012 tax years, said Sarah Minnick, director of the county Tax Claim Bureau.
Most of the money is owed to Laurel Highlands School District. A portion is owed to the county and the township.
John Cupp, solicitor for the assessment appeals board, said it's likely each taxing entity will exonerate the back taxes.
James Higinbotham, a Uniontown attorney who represents the cemetery, was unavailable for comment.
Liz Zemba is a reporter for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-601-2166 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.