Flooding issues still vex Bullskin
Bullskin Township supervisors are still dealing with flooding issues throughout the township after a hard rain several weeks ago.
This week resident Jack Raubaugh of Shenandoah Road questioned what could be done with Butler Run, a waterway behind his house that flooded and caused problems on his property.
Supervisor Deb Wiltrout said supervisors have received a permit from the Department of Environmental Protection to clear out the waterway.
“We're just going to go right down the middle and push stuff to the banks and build them up,” Wiltrout said.
The township has contacted the Boy Scouts to see if they would be willing to clean the stone and mud out of Raubaugh's yard as a community service project, she said.
“If we have any luck at all, we should be in the creek the first of next week,” Wiltrout said.
Raubaugh said he has been waiting for that for 35 years.
Scott Humbert, who lives on Moyer Road, asked if supervisors were going to do anything about the flooding of Irish Run. The township has applied for a permit from the DEP but has not yet gotten it approved, Wiltrout said.
In other business, supervisors approved motions to appoint a certified public accountant to perform the 2013 audit, to set the MMO union pension plan for 2014 at $58,344 and to set the MMO nonunion pension plan for 2014 at $22,250.
Trick or treat in the township is set for 3 to 6 p.m. Oct. 27.
A hard-to-recycle event for all of Fayette County will be held from 9 a.m. to 2 p.m. Oct. 5 at the Wharton Township Municipal Building.
Rachel Basinger is a contributing writer.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.