Connellsville man charged in beating
A Connellsville man has been placed behind bars for allegedly beating a man to the point where he had to be transported to a West Virginia hospital.
Stanford Allen Russell, 40, of 1429 Cambria St. was charged with aggravated assault, simple assault, recklessly endangering another person, harassment and disorderly conduct by on-call District Judge Randy Abraham.
At 8:53 p.m. Monday, police were called to Gibson Terrace.
According to police reports, Russell punched Justin Fletcher of Uniontown repeatedly in the head. Once Fletcher was on the ground, Russell allegedly kicked him and stomped him on the head.
Police said Fletcher was seriously injured during the assault.
Fletcher was flown to Ruby Memorial Hospital in Morgantown, W.Va., for treatment of his injuries. His condition was unavailable.
On Tuesday, police filed additional charges against Russell for an incident that occurred on Aug. 27 and 28.
A woman told police Russell entered her home along Sycamore Street in Connellsville and tried to force her to have sexual relations.
Police said Russell pushed, struck and choked the woman. Police said Russell struck a child, who was younger than 1, while in the home.
He was charged with burglary, simple assault, harassment and attempted rape.
A preliminary hearing has been scheduled for 10 a.m. Oct. 10 before District Judge Ronald Haggerty Jr. on the assault charges. A hearing has not yet been scheduled in the attempted rape case.
Russell was lodged in the Fayette County Prison in lieu of $50,000 bond.
Mark Hofmann is a staff writer with Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-626-3539 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.