Share This Page

Connellsville sets 2014 budget preparation sessions

| Wednesday, Oct. 16, 2013, 10:48 p.m.

Connellsville City Council will begin the 2014 budget preparation process on Oct. 30 at the first of four scheduled budget meetings.

On Wednesday, council set budget meetings for Oct. 30 and Nov. 6, 13 and 18 at 5 p.m. in City Council chambers.

City Treasurer Judy Keller said she doesn't understand why the meetings are scheduled so late.

“Today is the 16th (of October), and you're not going to have a meeting for two more weeks,” she said. “I just wish it would start earlier.”

In her report, Keller said that last year, in the months of October, November and December, the city collected just over $25,000, adding that this could be a ballpark figure for what the city can expect to collect for the remainder of this year.

In the budget for this year, the real estate collection for 2013 is projected to be $959,516.42, and the actual collection so far this year is $893,385.97, which is approximately $66,000 less than projected.

If the city collects the approximate $25,000 in the last three months of this year that it collected in the last three months of 2012, it will be short of its projections by approximately $40,000.

Earlier this week, some council members admitted that this year's budget meetings will be a challenge.

Some said a tax increase for 2014 may be necessary.

Councilwoman Marilyn Weaver, who last year suggested a slight tax increase but couldn't get support from the remainder of council and then voted against the 2013 spending plan, expressed disappointment this week with the lateness of the process. She believes the budget preparation should have begun sooner.

Weaver also said this week that even with a slight tax increase, the city still might have to consider taking out a loan.

Last year, the city took out a tax anticipation loan for $675,000. It will come due at the end of the year.

On Wednesday, council also passed a resolution authorizing the payment of $34,165.18 to the New Haven Hose Volunteer Fire Department from the Auditor General's Office supporting the Volunteer Fire Relief Association.

It also agreed to pay $380,494 into the police and firefighters pension plans in order to satisfy the Minimum Municipal Obligation. This includes $182,564 in General Municipal Pension System State Aid received from the Auditor General's Office. The city will have to take $197,929 from the general fund account to satisfy the remainder.

Councilman Brad Geyer said the MMO is to help continue to make the pension plans as solvent as they can.

In other business, council:

• Accepted a bid of $200 from Delores Tissue for a parcel of property adjacent to her property on Francis Avenue.

• Accepted a bid of $130 from John Molinaro for a parcel of property adjacent to his property on Run Avenue.

Councilman Gregory Ritch said it is council's intent to sell the small parcels of city property in order to put the property back on the tax rolls and save money by not having to maintain them.

• Passed a resolution to accept bids for a parcel of property along South Arch Street. Bids are to be received no later than Nov. 18 at 4 p.m. and to be opened on Nov. 20 at 7 p.m. at City Hall during the regular council meeting.

• Hired Alexandra Kopf as a part-time building monitor for the police department at a rate of $7.25 an hour.

Rachel Basinger is a contributing writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.