Share This Page

State police say woman spit on trooper

| Wednesday, Oct. 16, 2013, 12:01 a.m.

A North Union woman is accused of spitting in the face of a state police trooper who had arrested her husband after he allegedly slashed a 2-inch-long cut in her neck with a knife during an argument on Saturday morning.

Shawna Lynn Fant, 32, allegedly spit on the face and arm of Trooper Jason Delaini of the Uniontown barracks about6 a.m. at the couple's home when she was told she could not speak to Erik James Maselli, 33, of Uniontown because he was in custody.

Delaini told Fant to keep away from his patrol car when she allegedly began to yell profanities and walked toward the cruiser, police said.

Fant resisted being placed in the car, and two troopers had to forcefully put her into the vehicle, according to court records.

She initially told police that Maselli had left the Greenpoint Circle residence before police arrived.

Delaini and Trooper Michael D. Thompson arrested Maselli about 5:10 a.m. in an upstairs bedroom where he was hiding behind a dresser, police said. Thompson had to pull Maselli from behind the dresser and put him on the floor, and several troopers were needed to restrain and handcuff him, police stated in an affidavit filed against him.

Fant told police she was cut when she threatened to call police during the argument. Fayette County 911 received several hang-up calls, police said.

Fant was arraigned at the Fayette County booking center on charges of aggravated assault, resisting arrest and disorderly conduct. She was released on $5,000 bond.

Maselli was charged with simple assault and resisting arrest.

Maselli and Fant face a preliminary hearing Nov. 20 before Uniontown District Judge Wendy Dennis.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.