Uniontown Area board accepts business manager's resignation
Brent Filak resigned from his position as business manager in the Uniontown Area School District to return to his previous career as a CPA (certified public accountant).
The school board voted Monday night to accept Filak's resignation with regret.
“You're the best business manager the school district has had for the four years I've been on the school board,” board member Bill Gerke told Filak.
“You're an excellent person, and you have a wonderful job,” added school board president Thomas George.
Filak said he had already made his decision.
“I enjoyed my time here,” said Filak, who has served as business manager for the past 14 to 15 months. “But I want to go back to my previous life as a CPA.”
After accepting Filak's resignation, the board voted to promote assistant business manager Jill Regan to business manager. Regan will be paid $77,500 a year — the same starting salary that Filak and the previous business manager received.
A motion to hire constable Philip Michael, a member of Uniontown City Council, as the district's assistant police chief, failed.
Several school board members said they wanted Michael to fill in for school district police chief Donald Homer, who is currently on medical leave.
When board member Philip Holt made the motion to hire Michael, board members objected because a salary was not attached to the hiring.
“How can we hire someone when we don't even know how much money we would pay him?” asked school board member Dorothy Grahek. “We need to post the position to see if anyone who is currently working in the school district wants to apply. We need to be fair about this.”
Grahek suggested that school board members discuss the position at an upcoming committee meeting.
School board members Holt, George and Ken Meadows voted to hire Michael. Grahek and board member Susan Clay voted against the hiring. Board members Gerke, the Rev. Vincent Winfrey and William Rittenhouse passed on the motion.
Cindy Ekas is a contributing writer.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.