ShareThis Page

Father, son held for court in 2011 Connellsville murder

| Thursday, Oct. 24, 2013, 5:21 p.m.
Evan R. Sanders | Daily Courier
Robert Leroy Daniels Jr. is led out of District Judge Ronald Haggerty's office in Connellsville on Thursday, October 3, 2013. Daniels has been charged with criminal homicide, theft by unlawful taking, robbery and receiving stolen property.
Mark Hofmann | Daily Courier
Robert Leroy Daniels III is escorted out of District Judge Ronald Haggerty Jr.'s office by Connellsville Officer Bryan Kendi following Daniels' arraignment on Monday afternoon, October 7, 2013. Daniels was charged with criminal homicide in the murder of David Gida in 2011. Last week, Daniels' father, Robert Leroy Daniels Jr., was arrested in connection with the murder.

A father and son charged in the murder of a Connellsville man in 2011 were bound over for trial in Fayette County Court on Thursday.

Robert Leroy Daniels Jr., 42, and his son, Robert Leroy Daniels III, 18, both of 233B E. Apple St., were charged in the murder of David Gida, 56, of Connellsville, in June 2011 in his apartment on South Pittsburgh Street.

Both men pleaded not guilty, according to their attorneys, William and Lea Bickerton of Pittsburgh.

District Judge Ronald Haggerty Jr. held the father and son for court on Thursday following a preliminary hearing.

One charge of criminal conspiracy and one charge of tampering with evidence were added to the charges of criminal homicide, robbery, theft by unlawful taking and receiving stolen property for Robert Daniels Jr. One charge of criminal conspiracy was added to criminal homicide, robbery, theft by unlawful taking and receiving stolen property already filed against Robert Leroy Daniels III.

Connellsville police Cpl. John James was the first officer on the scene in June after Gida's body was discovered. James testified Thursday he entered Gida's apartment around noon after being flagged down by Justin Gida, son of the victim.

James said he found the victim, who had partially fallen out of a chair, lying on his right side with blood pooled around the body. He said there was a puncture wound on the victim's neck.

Fayette County Assistant District Attorney Mark Brooks submitted the autopsy report by forensic pathologist Cyril Wecht, indicating the cause of death was homicide.

According to the autopsy report, Gida was stabbed twice in the neck.

Connellsville Sgt. Ryan Reese testified Robert Daniels Jr., the father who was identified by his son as the one who stabbed Gida, confessed after being shown a written statement by his son about how the victim was stabbed.

According to Connellsville police, the younger Daniels said he held the victim's head while his father stabbed Gida. After Gida brought his hand up to the wound, the older Daniels then stabbed Gida again through the victim's hand.

In the statements to police, the younger Daniels said his father took a gold chain, a silver ring and a baseball before doing some cleaning up of the scene.

The older Daniels, in his statements, said he only took the chain, which he threw away after leaving the apartment. He said he had gone to the apartment after taking a Valium and drinking a beer at a local bar.

Gida's family members later found an autographed baseball they thought had been stolen. Another baseball was still missing.

Reese said both victims had been made aware of their rights numerous times.

The men were given polygraph tests by state police in Uniontown.

Lea Bickerton asked Reese several times about the mental state of Robert Leroy Daniels III. She questioned if Reese knew that her client was allegedly not mentally competent.

Reese said there were no indications that Robert Leroy Daniels III did not understand.

Karl Polacek is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at or 724-626-3538.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.