Share This Page

Bullskin couple gets approval for kennel

| Thursday, Oct. 31, 2013, 12:01 a.m.

The Fayette County Zoning Hearing Board granted a special exception for a Bullskin couple to have a kennel on their property.

Billi Gowatski asked the board on two occasions for permission to build a 30-capacity dog and cat kennel on the property zoned A-1 agriculture where she and her husband live. Wednesday's zoning hearing was the third time she appeared before the board after two hearings were continued.

The decision came after more than three hours of testimony.

Those against the kennel said they had concerns of noise, odor and safety.

Neighbor Edward Franks said he had concerns his quality of life would change for the worse if the kennel would go up. In previous hearings, Gowatski's testimony of her plans for the kennel showed the facility would meet the county's zoning ordinance requirements, including keeping the recommended distance of at least 100 feet from other residents' property.

Franks said he fears for his safety if a dog would get loose. He has four children, and there are four other children in the area younger than 12.

“Would you build a house next to a 30-capacity kennel?” asked Gretchen Mundorff, the attorney for those against the building of the kennel.

Theresa Franks said she wouldn't choose to live near a kennel.

Rich Bower, attorney for Gowatski, asked the neighbors if they had looked into possible uses for an area zoned A-1. Farms could produce the odor of fertilizer and noise from animals such as pigs and sheep.

“I never thought of a dog kennel coming to the area,” Theresa Franks said.

Michelle Lowe, another neighbor, said her bedroom window faces the proposed kennel location.

“The noise would keep me up,” she said.

Resident Kimberly Ulery said her home does not have air conditioning and her windows are open all the time. She worries about odors that would come from the kennel.

Neighbor Jonathan Poorbaugh was in favor of the kennel.

“It's their property. They should do what they want with it.”

Mark Hofmann is a staff writer with Trib Total Media.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.