Share This Page

Mt. Pleasant council to see proposed budget with no tax hike

| Wednesday, Nov. 6, 2013, 12:01 a.m.

Mt. Pleasant Borough Manager Jeff Landy and the finance committee will present a balanced 2014 proposed budget with no tax increase to council at its next work session for approval to advertise.

Councilwoman Susan Ruszkowski said Monday night she thought the budget was tight this year, but Landy came up with some creative ways to raise the revenue.

Landy said that as a result of health care insurance meetings, the borough was able to do a little better this year and still provide the health care services that employees are used to.

Council President Joe Bauer said it is impressive to pass a balanced budget that contains no tax increase, without cutting services.

“There are some things that we have no control over — health care, contracts — and that takes up 10 or 11 mills right there,” he said. “So with just 5 mills worth of taxes, we're doing everything else that we do in this town, from all of our activities to our improvements.

“We're ahead of the game right now,” he added, noting that the borough dodged another bullet this year.

In other business, council:

• Passed a motion to close Main Street (Route 31) from Braddock Road Avenue to Cherry Avenue between 10:30 a.m. and 1 p.m. Dec. 7 for the borough's Christmas parade, and Diamond Street (Route 981) from Main Street to Washington Street between noon and 2 p.m. the same day for Christmas programs.

• Passed motions to hire Michael Murphy of Greensburg as a part-time police officer and to add a speed bump in the rear of Independence Apartments.

• Approved free parking on borough streets from Nov. 29 to Jan. 2.

• Announced the Veterans Day parade will begin at 10:30 a.m. A ceremony will follow at 11 a.m.

Rachel Basinger is a contributing writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.