Looking back to look forward to positive days once again
After decades of decline, a spark of redevelopment and renovation has been lit in Connellsville in recent years. Dilapidated buildings are coming down or — as in the case of the old Aaron's Furniture building — being renovated. New buildings and businesses are opening. A hotel near Yough Park is right around the corner. Young people are getting involved in city matters. The list goes on and on.
Things are definitely looking up. However, to really know where we're headed in 2014 and beyond, we must know where we've been. The past is prologue, or so the old saying goes.
In keeping with that, on Monday, the Daily Courier begins “The Way We Were,” followed by “Where We're Headed,” a series of articles tracing Connellsville's past through the eyes of residents who lived it. From the 1930s through the New Millennium, “The Way We Were” will give a human perspective of Connellsville's boomtown years as well as its hard times and will end with a flourish, focusing on good news — we hope — for the future of our town in particular and Southwestern Pennsylvania in general.
Interviews for this series began this past summer and have continued ever since.
The Daily Courier thanks all those who agreed to interviews, those who provided photos and took photos and those who assisted with historical data.
We hope that readers will view “The Way We Were” and “Where We're Headed” as a special holiday treat and that they enjoy reading this series as much as we enjoyed compiling it. With that, read on…and on…and on, towards a brighter future.
Laura Szepesi is a contributing writer.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.