Confluence man pleads guilty to assaults on 2 boys
A Somerset County man pleaded guilty Friday to sexual assault and other charges that could put him in a state prison for up to 50 years.
Brian T. Lynch, 45, of Confluence entered guilty pleas to charges including rape of a child, kidnapping and statutory sexual assault, all stemming from several incidents involving two children.
Lynch's plea agreement calls for him to serve two consecutive sentences totaling 25 to 50 years, District Attorney Jack Heneks told President Judge John F. Wagner Jr. on Friday.
Wagner asked Lynch if he understands the amount of time he could be serving as a result of his guilty plea.
“Essentially, it's the rest of your life,” Wagner said.
“Yeah, I understand,” Lynch replied. “I'll take this plea.”
Lynch kidnapped a 6-year-old boy on May 4 and drove him to Latrobe, where he sexually assaulted the child, police said.
Lynch sexually assaulted a 10-year-old boy on three occasions between October 2010 and November 2011, police said.
In the May 4 assault, Lynch told Wagner, he drove the boy to an area near Creekside Park and attempted to have sex with him in the back seat of a car.
A statewide Amber Alert had been issued for the boy after he disappeared from his Henry Clay Township home.
The youngster was discovered at 1:55 a.m. May 5 at Ligonier and Cedar streets, about three blocks from the park, Latrobe police said.
In the earlier case, Lynch drove the boy to three locations in Fayette and Somerset counties and asked about a sex act, police said. The boy refused, Lynch told Wagner.
Lynch is scheduled to be sentenced on Jan. 27.
Bob Stiles is a staff writerfor Trib Total Media.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.