Share This Page

Lawsuit filed against North Union bar in fatal accident

| Monday, Dec. 16, 2013, 4:42 p.m.

A civil lawsuit accuses a bar in Fayette County of negligence for allegedly serving an intoxicated man who later was involved in a fatal motor vehicle accident.

Michaelene V. Ruffcorn, administratrix of the late Anthony Balosky's estate, named Walt's Lounge on West Main Street in North Union as the defendant in the suit filed in county Common Pleas Court.

Balosky, 35, of Republic, died Aug. 1, 2012, at 11:40 p.m. when his vehicle was hit by a pickup truck driven by Gary Lee Brackenbury Jr.

Brackenbury, 34, of Brownsville, pleaded guilty Dec. 5 to homicide by vehicle while driving under the influence and related charges. He faces 3 to 6 years in prison when he is sentenced Jan. 2.

In the lawsuit, attorney James T. Davis of Uniontown alleges the lounge served Brackenbury three shots in “a short amount of time” and sold him a six-pack of beer before the accident.

Davis contended the bar failed to realize Brackenbury “was becoming intoxicated” and failed to “remove Mr. Brackenbury from the premises when it was known he was intoxicated.”

According to the lawsuit, the bar is owned by Walter and Richard Guziak. Neither could be reached for comment.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.