Plans progress for hotel on Connellsville's West Side
Plans are on track for the completion this year of a 54-room hotel in Connellsville.
Chris Rosselot, project spokesperson with Grant Forbes for the Hotel d2 Services project on Connellsville's West Side, said the Department of Environmental Protection notice of the requirement recently sent to the Connellsville Municipal Authority for sewage planning modules is “just part of the planning process.”
He said if problems are found with the size of the sewage lines, they would be replaced during the hotel construction.
Previously, Hotel d2 had planned to break ground for the hotel, with Cobblestone as the potential hotel owner, in December.
The groundbreaking had to be rescheduled, and details will be announced when plans are made, the developers said.
The hotel will be built on the site of the former Connellsville Bottling plant on First Street.
The plant will be demolished before site work begins.
Rosselot said construction of the hotel is on track for completion before the end of the year.
The structure would feature a building with two wings, with a driveway running through a center section. The building would will be raised 3 feet higher than the current elevation to keep the first floor above the flood plain since it will be near the Youghiogheny River.
Potential guests include bikers and hikers along the Great Allegheny Passage.
Those traveling by rail on Amtrak from the Washington area or the Midwest could leave the Capitol Limited with their bicycles or hiking gear, cross the river and stay overnight in the hotel before heading east on the passage.
Karl Polacek is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at email@example.com or 724-626-3538.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.