3 Connellsville buildings to be demolished
Connellsville Health Board took action this week on several properties, including three that are to be demolished.
City health officer Tom Currey said the board heard evidence presented by Charles Osler, owner of a building at 122 S. Pittsburgh St., concerning his work to bring it up to code. Osler had been informed the year he was given to work on the property will expire on March 15.
Osler convinced the board he was attempting to continue work on the building. The board then voted to give Osler another year, as long as he renews his bond with the insurance company.
The board voted to inform Paula Upton, owner of a house at 256 E. Fairview Ave., the building has been declared unfit for human habitation and she will have 30 days to demolish it.
Currey said the city has been dealing with problems with the property since September 2010. He said there has been no measurable improvement and the building has continued to deteriorate.
The board heard a house, at 239 S. Carnegie Ave., will be demolished after it was damaged in a fire on Feb. 20. The owner has insurance and has informed the city of the demolition, although no permit was obtained.
Another fire-damaged home at 213 Ogden St., which was occupied by the Brian Upton family, will be demolished. Currey said the owner, Warren Upton, informed the city of the intention to demolish the structure.
Upton has not yet obtained a permit for the demolition.
No word was received from city council concerning any questions about the proposed vacant or bad building ordinance.
The board reorganized, with Johanna Harden elected president and Susan Lewis elected vice president. The next board meeting is scheduled for 6:45 p.m. on March 24.
Karl Polacek is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org or 724-626-3538.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.