ShareThis Page

Connellsville porch fire ruled arson; truck fire pending

| Wednesday, Feb. 26, 2014, 12:16 a.m.

A residential porch fire was confirmed to be arson and a truck fire was deemed to be undetermined in Connellsville.

New Haven Hose Company Volunteer Fire Department Chief Bob Topper said on Tuesday that the fire marshal with the state police at Uniontown investigated the two Monday morning blazes.

The first was reported as a porch fire to Fayette County 911 at 6:10 a.m. at a vacant structure at 314 W. Murphy Ave. Connellsville Police responded and found a cardboard box of vinyl siding on fire.

Connellsville police Chief Jim Capitos said officers were able to put out the fire with extinguishers from their police vehicles before it could spread beyond the porch.

Topper said that fire was determined to be arson.

The second call came in about 6:20 a.m. concerning a fully involved vehicle fire at Cummings Avenue and Highland Avenue behind Pizza Hut.

Topper said a Mack truck parked along that street was fully engulfed when firefighters from New Haven Hose arrived on the scene. It took firefighters five to 10 minutes to extinguish the blaze. Connellsville Township VFD was on standby.

The fire marshal told Topper that the truck fire was undetermined in nature.

The Monday morning fires occurred after a confirmed arson on Thursday night at a vacant house at 239 S. Carnegie Ave. in the city. That house sustained significant fire damage.

Capitos said, because of the suspicious nature of the fires, residents should be aware of anyone or anything that seems out of the ordinary and call 911 to report it.

Mark Hofmann is a staff writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.