South Union motorist charged in crash that injured 1
The driver of a Cadillac Escalade that struck a Belle Vernon man who was working on a broken water line in Uniontown on Feb. 5 is charged with drunken driving.
Heather Jean Smith, 37, of South Union Township refused to submit to a blood draw, according to Patrolman Jason Fidazzo, who this month filed charges of driving under the influence, careless driving and reckless driving.
Justin Nash, 39, of Belle Vernon was struck by the vehicle just before 11:30 p.m. as he and another Pennsylvania American Water Co. worker were repairing a line at East Fayette and Grant streets. Police said both men were wearing reflective vests.
Nicholas Hlasnick, 26, of West Mifflin told police he attempted to push Nash out of the way of the oncoming vehicle, “but he wasn't fast enough,” Fidazzo wrote in the complaint.
The Cadillac struck the men's work vehicle, which was parked with its four-way flashers on about 15 feet from where they were working, police said.
Smith, who remained at the scene, needed assistance standing, had slurred speech and smelled of alcohol, according to the complaint. Smith told police that “the guy walked right out in front of her,” Fidazzo wrote.
Nash was treated in UPMC Presbyterian in Pittsburgh and released. His injuries were not detailed by police.
Smith could not be reached for comment.
A summons has been mailed to her. A preliminary hearing before District Judge Michael Metros is scheduled for April 1.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.