Hearing in Connellsville Twp. home invasion continued
The preliminary hearing for two Connellsville juveniles charged in the home invasion and assault of a 79-year-old man has been continued.
Terry Lee Nicholson III, 17, of 513 Vine St., and Duston Edward Wiggins, 16, of 108 W. Cedar St., were charged as adults following the Feb. 14 attack on Connellsville Township resident Caesar Gaspari.
The hearing had been scheduled for Thursday before District Judge Ronald Haggerty Jr.
According to an affidavit of probable cause, Nicholson, Wiggins and a 14-year-old boy rang the doorbell at Gaspari's residence. When Gaspari opened the door, the 14-year-old pushed him out of the doorway, pointed a black pistol at him and then struck him twice in the head and the face with the pistol when Gaspari resisted.
Nicholson and Wiggins proceeded into the living room, where Lisa Gaspari was standing, and pointed black pistols at her, police said,. The two demanded money as the 14-year-old hit Caesar Gaspari, who later was treated for his various injuries.
Lisa Gaspari led Nicholson and Wiggins to a bedroom, where she gave them a safe containing $600, documents and an unknown amount of change.
The trio then fled. They were apprehended by police, who followed their tracks in the snow to Wiggins' residence, where his parents allowed a search. Police said they found the safe and $490.
Fayette County District Attorney Jack Heneks stated earlier that, pursuant to the Juvenile Act, the juvenile charges will remain against the 14-year-old pending further discussions among the Juvenile Probation Office, the District Attorney's Office and state police at Uniontown.
A new date for Nicholson's and Wiggins' preliminary hearing has not yet been set. Both are free on $30,000 bond.
Mark Hofmann is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org or 724-626-3539.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.