Fayette County residents sue over landfill fumes
Residents living near a Fayette County landfill they claim is emitting noxious fumes went to court Friday seeking more than $50,000 in damages.
In a lawsuit, residents of 60 homes near the Chestnut Valley Landfill on McClellandtown Road in German claim the odors coming from the dump are hurting them and their properties.
“The underlying cause of the offsite odors ... is defendant's negligent and reckless failure to control and contain the landfill gas generated within,” the suit states.
An official at the landfill declined to comment, referring questions to Advanced Disposal Services, a waste collection company in Florida that runs multiple sites along the East Coast and in the Midwest.
In the suit, 144 people living near the landfill claim they have suffered the “loss of use and enjoyment of their properties” in addition to “annoyance, inconvenience and physical discomfort.” The majority live on Messmore and McClellandtown roads.
In an email, company spokeswoman Mary O'Brien said she could not comment specifically on the suit.
“We are aware of the neighbor's concerns and have taken numerous measures to minimize any impact. We have conducted numerous tests and ... we have been monitoring air quality continually and results show that any presence of the reported odor poses no threat, ” she wrote.
Attorney Todd S. Hageman said the residents have not “filed any claims for personal injury.”
The state Department of Environmental Protection collected air samples in October in response to complaints and reported the “potential for exposures to landfill gases” in nearby areas. State officials recommended additional engineering controls.
O'Brien said the state Department of Health on Feb. 7 issued a report, requested by the DEP, which found “no health threats.”
Renatta Signorini is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Lynn: Fayette communities enjoying holidays
- A Christmas story: Childhood holiday in Dunbar recollected