Fayette County businessman Fike announces bid for state Senate seat
A Fayette County businessman has announced he will seek the Democratic nomination in the spring primary to succeed state Sen. Richard Kasunic.
Kasunic, 67, of Dunbar Township is retiring after representing the 32nd District for more than three decades.
Harry Fike, 68, of South Union said he will be a “citizen soldier” as opposed to what he refers to as a “permanent political pay roller.”
Fike pledged to protect the area's coal industry from overzealous regulation and to relieve homeowners “from oppressive property taxes.”
He said he would work to fund infrastructure improvements, which will encourage new business development.
In the 1980s, Fike served as an elected director on the Laurel Highlands school board, along with two terms as the controller for Fayette County.
Fike returned to private life after leaving the controller's office.
He has operated Penn State Auto Sales, a used auto dealership in Uniontown, since the 1960s.
He has served as a member and chairman of the Fayette County Housing Authority and the county's redevelopment authority.
Under redistricting, the 32nd District covers all of Fayette and Somerset counties and a portion of southeastern Westmoreland County.
Kasunic, who has held the seat since 1994, recently announced he will not seek re-election. The primary is May 20.
In addition to Fike, Democrats filing petitions to seek the party nomination include state Rep. Deberah Kula of Fayette City, and Rosemary Ambrosino of Uniontown.
Republican candidate Pat Stefano of Bullskin faces no opposition in the primary. He operates Stefano Printing in Dunbar.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.