Mill Run man due for hearing after chase, damage to police vehicle
A Mill Run man who police say led then on a high-speed chase over the weekend, resulting in a damaged state police vehicle, has been charged.
Ricky Nelson Richter Sr., 47, of 318 Ash St. was charged with fleeing or attempting to elude police, recklessly endangering another person, criminal mischief and 13 traffic violations before on-call District Judge Michael Metros.
The charges stem from an incident at 1:07 a.m. Saturday when Connellsville Police spotted Richter's vehicle, a Ford Ranger, in the Sheetz parking lot. Police ran the plates to find Richter's vehicle was suspended for an insurance cancellation.
The vehicle exited the parking lot onto West Crawford at a red light, but ran the light before police could activate their lights and sirens, according to the complaint.
Connellsville police chased Richter's truck on West Crawford Avenue at speeds in excess of 65 mph, not stopping for red lights. The chase continued onto Snyder Street and up Route 711 in excess of 80 mph.
At one point, Richter's vehicle made a sharp left turn onto Route 653 in Normalville, then onto Camp Wildwood Road and onto a logging road where a police vehicle became stuck and could not continue the chase.
Connellsville Police contacted state police at Uniontown and provided a location where Richter's vehicle could possibly re-enter on Route 653.
Troopers were able to locate the vehicle and bring it to a stop when someone fled from them and caused damage to the police vehicle.
Damage estimates will be available at Richter's preliminary hearing, which is scheduled for 10:30 a.m. Thursday before District Judge Ronald Haggerty Jr.
Richter was lodged in the Fayette County Prison in lieu of $50,000 bond.
Mark Hofmann is a staff writer with Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-626-3539 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.