Bullskin fire victim in fair condition
The walls are still standing, but the roof and insides of a home at 159 Spaugy Hollow Road in Bullskin were destroyed by a fire during the early morning hours on April 11, 2014.
Photo by Karl Polacek | Daily Courier
A house fire overnight in Bullskin nearly cost an elderly woman her life.
“A woman was actually trapped inside,” said First Lt. Dale Peck of the Bullskin Volunteer Fire Department.
The fire occurred early Friday at 195 Spaugy Hollow Road.
“Her son dragged her to safety or we would have had a fatality,” Peck said.
According to firefighters, flames were through the roof of the one-story ranch-style house when they arrived. Firefighters said the house was destroyed.
The woman, Janet Kinneer, was taken to Frick hospital in Mt. Pleasant, reportedly suffering from smoke inhalation. According to a spokesperson from Frick, she was later transferred to UPMC Mercy in Pittsburgh. A spokesperson for UPMC Mercy said Kinneer is in fair condition. No further information was available.
Firefighters from Everson, Connellsville Township, Normalville, Springfield, Morrell, Dawson, Chestnut Ridge, South Connellsville, and New Haven Hose also fought the blaze, which was called into Fayette County 911 at 3:26 a.m. Fayette EMS was also at the scene.
Firemen were on scene until 6:18 a.m.
Karl Polacek is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org or 724-626-3538.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.