Share This Page

Uniontown man accused of soliciting sex from teen

| Wednesday, June 4, 2014, 12:01 a.m.

A Uniontown man was arrested in Reserve Township for allegedly soliciting sex from a 15-year-old boy.

According to Daily Courier's news partners at WPXI, Jeremy Burnworth, 35, was pulled over on Monday for driving the wrong way on Pittview Avenue in Reserve Township, Allegheny County.

The officer reported that Burnworth and his 15-year-old passenger appeared to be “very nervous.”

“(The officer) thought that there was some other activity that may be afloat,” police Chief Fred Boory said.

According to court paperwork, the boy told police he had been talking to Burnworth for several weeks on a social networking site called Grindr, and he admitted telling Burnworth that he was 17.

The criminal complaint said Burnworth sent explicit pictures of himself to the boy. In all, officers said, the two exchanged about 50 text messages, including nude photos.

Police said Burnsworth told investigators that his intent was to have sex with the boy. Police said there were several items seized from the car that will be used in the investigation.

Police took the boy home, and Burnworth was taken to the Allegheny County Jail on multiple charges, including statutory sexual assault.

According to the criminal complaint, Burnworth admitted that “he had been fooled in the past by a juvenile whom he later realized after meeting him was under the age of 18.”

Burnworth was charged with corruption of minors, criminal use of communication facility, unlawful contact with a minor, criminal solicitation, statutory sexual assault and disorderly conduct.

A preliminary hearing is scheduled for 1 p.m. June 12 before District Judge Robert Paul Dzvonick.

Burnworth is free on $20,000 bond.

Mark Hofmann is a staff writer with Trib Total Media. He can be reached at mhofmann@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.