Verizon sues Pennsylvania American Water Co. over broken underground line
Verizon claims in a civil lawsuit that a water company and one of its contractors hit an underground Verizon line in Fayette County and now owes the communications company $286,072.
Pennsylvania American Water Co., with an office in Uniontown, and Lee's Plumbing and Excavating of German Township are named as defendants in the six-count lawsuit filed on Monday in the prothonotary's office.
Verizon contends neither the water company nor Lee's contacted Pennsylvania One Call — a service that maintains information about the location of utility lines — before the contractor started a project at the corner of Morgantown and Main streets in Uniontown on Sept. 1, 2012.
As a result, one of Verizon's underground lines was damaged, according to the lawsuit.
Cost to repair the damaged line is listed in the lawsuit as $286,072, with $127,097 in labor costs, $102,163 to a contractor and $41,088 for materials, according to the lawsuit.
Verizon is claiming negligence and a violation of the Pennsylvania One Call statute.
Under the statute, anyone who is planning an excavation is to contact Pennsylvania One Call, then wait a “reasonable time” for the agency to respond before work gets under way, according to the lawsuit.
Both Josephine Posti, spokeswoman for Pennsylvania American Water, and Bob Jurosco of Lee's declined to comment on Monday because neither has seen the lawsuit.
No one from Verizon returned a phone call seeking additional details on the type of line that was damaged, or how long customers were without service.
Liz Zemba is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-601-2166 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.