Connellsville couple admit to thefts in order to buy drugs
Charges have been filed against a Connellsville couple after they allegedly stole items from throughout a neighborhood and then sold the items for drugs.
Scott Allen Jeffries, 41, and Jennifer Showman, 30, both of 917 1⁄2 Sycamore St., have been charged with burglary, criminal mischief and other related charges. The charges were filed with on-call District Judge Michael Metros.
Connellsville police filed the charges against the couple after investigating the theft from the garage of a Connellsville resident between June 4 and 5.
Stolen were a weed trimmer, a Craftsman tool box containing a circular saw and an Ames plastic yard cart.
The Ames plastic yard cart was found later on June 5 in the back of the residence of Jeffries and Showman.
Police also found several items taken from a neighboring backyard and flowers and lighting that came from throughout the neighborhood.
Showman allegedly told police she and Jeffries stole the items with the assistance of a third person.
Showman told police they exchanged the stolen weed eater, the tools and the saw for drugs.
A preliminary hearing for Jeffries and Showman is scheduled before District Judge Ronald Haggerty Jr. at 9:30 a.m. July 24.
Both are lodged in the Fayette County Prison in lieu of $50,000 each.
No charges have yet been filed against two other individuals believed involved in the thefts.
Mark Hofmann is a staff writer with Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-626-3539 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.