ShareThis Page

Uniontown man charged with sword attack

| Tuesday, July 1, 2014, 11:09 p.m.

A North Union man escaped serious injury Friday when a Uniontown man slashed him with a sword, state police said.

Shane L. Tyson, 36, is charged with aggravated assault, simple assault and harassment for attacking Chad E. Workman outside Workman's home along Garden Lane about 7:36 a.m., according to police.

Workman awoke to an argument outside his front door between Workman's wife, Stephanie, and Tyson, according to an affidavit of probable cause filed before District Judge Wendy Dennis.

Stephanie Workman had dated Tyson, who was calling her names as the two argued over a bank card, police said.

“(Chad) Workman related that he woke up, walked to the door and asked Tyson to leave,” Trooper Marc Packrall wrote in the affidavit.

Tyson then pulled a sword out of an orange bamboo case he was carrying and struck Chad Workman on the left side of his body, causing a large laceration, both Workmans told police.

“Workman related that he then grabbed a spatula and metal brush off his grill on the porch to defend himself,” Packrall wrote.

Tyson fled.

Workman was treated at Uniontown Hospital and released that same day, according to police.

When troopers later questioned Tyson at his home, he claimed he went to the Workman home to retrieve his bank card. He said he was attacked by Chad Workman with the grilling utensils, so he struck Workman with the sword in self-defense, the affidavit said.

Tyson was arraigned and released after posting $15,000 bail. His preliminary hearing is scheduled for Aug. 13 before Dennis.

Paul Peirce is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-850-2860 or at ppeirce@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.