Share This Page

Connellsville boys restrained, forced to smoke marijuana, police say

| Friday, July 4, 2014, 12:01 a.m.

A couple is behind bars after they allegedly held two children against their will and had them smoke marijuana.

Kenneth Chester Zyskowski, also known as Chester Stone, 43, of Greensburg and Kaylee Lashae Brinker, 48, of Connellsville—no complete addresses available—were charged with two counts each of endangering the welfare of children, unlawful restraint of a minor with risk of bodily injury and corruption of minors before District Judge Brenda K. Cavalcante on June 23.

The charges stem from an incident in which South Connellsville Police responded to a home along West Painter Street at about 10:21 p.m. April 11.

Two boys told police that while in the basement of the residence, they were restrained by Zyskowski and Brinker and not permitted to leave the basement, according to court documents.

While in a room in the basement, Zyskowski and Brinker forced the two boys to smoke marijuana to the degree where one of them passed out and the other became violently ill and vomited, thereby placing the two in serious danger of death or serious bodily injury, police said.

Both Zyskowski and Brinker were placed in the Fayette County Prison on June 23 in lieu of $15,000 bond.

A preliminary hearing was originally scheduled for July 3 before District Judge Ronald Haggerty Jr., but has been continued to a date not yet scheduled.

Mark Hofmann is a staff writer with Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-626-3539 or mhofmann@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.