Connellsville controller charged with disorderly conduct
Connellsville's city controller was arrested on Thursday.
State police at Uniontown charged Blaine Michael Brooks, 27, of 514 E. Green St. with disorderly conduct and resisting arrest at District Judge Richard Kasunic II's office.
The charges stem from an incident earlier that day when a trooper was called to an incident at Green Ridge Memorial Park in Bullskin Township where Brooks was reportedly being disruptive and preventing a man from moving his truck.
Tpr. D'Andre Bailey said that when he stepped out of his vehicle, Brooks twice told him to leave the scene, that he didn't want the trooper there.
When Brooks was told to move his truck, he reportedly told the trooper to move his police vehicle or he would hit it and also told the trooper to move his car off the grass.
When another trooper arrived on the scene, Brooks reportedly was belligerent to him, using profanities, vulgar gestures and following the trooper wherever he went.
Police then reported that when the trooper was directing Brooks to back up, Brooks continued yelling and walking toward the trooper and was then placed under arrest, which he resisted when both troopers attempted to get his hands behind his back to handcuff.
While being secured for transport, Bailey reported that Brooks said, “can we make a deal, this will ruin my life.”
A preliminary hearing was scheduled before District Judge Ronald Haggerty Jr. at 10 a.m. July 17. Brooks is free on 10 percent of a $5,000 bond.
Brooks was elected as the city's controller in 2013 and was sworn into office in January.
Mark Hofmann is a staff writer with Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-626-3539 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.