Uniontown man reports theft of lizard in burglary
A Fayette County man, whose dog was shot on Wednesday during a dispute over a cellphone, has reported that someone stole his pet lizard, according to police.
Stephen Guziak told Uniontown Police someone broke into his residence sometime between 7:30 p.m. Sunday and 3 p.m. Monday and took a brown female bearded dragon lizard from a glass case in his living room, a police report said.
Glass on a side door was broken to gain entry. Other items that were taken include two flat-screen televisions and three computer game consoles.
Several days earlier, Guziak told police that Christian Palm, 21, of Uniontown, shot his pit bull during a dispute over a cellphone.
Palm is charged with simple assault, reckless endangerment, terroristic threats, criminal trespass and animal cruelty.
In a criminal complaint, Officer Eric Hanula said Palm and several unidentified persons entered Guziak's house at 12:57 a.m. Wednesday.
Guziak told police Palm waved a gun around, pointed it at him and threatened to shoot him if he did not give Palm money he was owed for a cellphone.
Palm and the others left the house via a rear door, “at which time he (Guziak) observed Palm fire the gun, shooting his dog once in the area of the head. Guziak related that the dog yelped and began bleeding heavily.”
Guziak took the dog to Cheat Lake Animal Hospital near Morgantown, W.Va.
Liz Zemba is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-601-2166 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.