Share This Page

Uniontown woman accused of stabbing man

| Monday, July 21, 2014, 7:09 p.m.

A Uniontown woman is accused of stabbing a man during an argument, then locking the doors to her home when police and paramedics arrived.

Vikki Diane Cianni, 47, of North Gallatin Avenue, is charged by city police with aggravated assault, simple assault, fictitious reports and hindering apprehension.

Police said Cianni used a steak knife to stab James Smallwood in the chest and arm during an argument about 8:30 a.m. Sunday at her residence. She called 911 for an ambulance, but when police and paramedics arrived, she locked the doors and refused them entry, Officer John Kauer said in a criminal complaint.

Kauer kicked in the front door when he heard crying inside, according to the complaint. Cianni told them Smallwood, who had trouble standing and had to be helped to a chair, fell down stairs, police said.

Paramedics discovered “deep puncture” wounds on Smallwood's chest and arm, according to the complaint. Two bloody kitchen knives were found in the dining room, next to a bloody handprint, police said.

Smallwood, who told police Cianni stabbed him, was flown to UPMC Presbyterian hospital in Pittsburgh.

Cianni was arraigned before Uniontown District Judge Michael Metros and placed in the Fayette County jail in lieu of $25,000 bond. She faces a preliminary hearing on July 29 before Metros.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.