Share This Page

Insurer asks judge to decide payment from fatal South Union accident

| Tuesday, July 22, 2014, 6:18 p.m.

An insurance company wants a judge to decide how to distribute $30,000 in liability payments to the families of two teenagers who died in a vehicle accident and to two others who were injured.

In the civil action filed on Monday in Fayette County, Titan Insurance Company of Cleveland, Ohio, identifies a Rodney A. Harris as the driver of a 2009 Honda Accord that crashed into another vehicle on March 12 on Walnut Hill Road in South Union Township.

Two passengers, De'Andre “DJ” Jones, 17, and Trevor McFadden, 16, both of Uniontown, died in the crash. A third passenger, Ziare M. Ellis, was injured, along with the driver of the other vehicle, Cynthia Kowalski, according to the civil filing.

No criminal charges have been filed in the accident, but a state police investigation is ongoing, according to District Attorney Jack Heneks.

In the civil action, Titan said it insured the vehicle for the owner, Harlan Henry Haynes, 50, of Uniontown. Haynes' policy had bodily injury liability coverage of $15,000 per person and $30,000 per occurrence.

Titan wants permission to deposit $30,000 with the courts and for a judge to help determine how to distribute the money among the two people who were hurt and the families of the two teens who died, according to the civil filing.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.