Sister enters plea bargain in Fayette mugging case
One of the Fayette County sisters charged in connection with the mugging of an elderly woman who later died could spend up to five years in prison under terms of a plea bargain.
Jenna Boyd, 27, and her sister, Brittany Boyd, 26, both of North Union, were charged in the March 22, 2013, mugging in a Wal-Mart parking lot.
The victim, Mary Yourchik, broke her hip in three places when Brittany Boyd took her purse and shoved her to the pavement, police said.
Yourchik never walked again without assistance and was unable to resume living on her own, her family said. She suffered a stroke less than three months after the mugging and died on Nov. 25 in Mt. Macrina Manor in Uniontown.
Brittany Boyd on May 6 pleaded guilty to robbery, aggravated assault and other charges. Judge Steve Leakinen sentenced her to nine to 20 years in prison.
Jenna Boyd was awaiting trial on a different set of charges. Police said Jenna Boyd was in the car when her sister grabbed Yourchik's purse before the two sped off with their young children in the backseat.
A trial was averted on Monday when Jenna Boyd entered into a plea bargain before President Judge John F. Wagner Jr., according to Michelle Kelley, assistant district attorney.
Kelley said Boyd pleaded guilty to three counts of child endangerment and two counts of unsworn falsification. In exchange, a theft charge was dropped, and she is to be sentenced to one to five years in prison.
Jenna Boyd is free on bond, pending her sentencing next week before Wagner.
Liz Zemba is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-601-2166 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.