Science is focus of Connellsville library's survivor challenge
Survival games at the Carnegie Free Library in Connellsville have gone on since June 27. The final day of the challenge took place five weeks later in the basement of the library, according to Eileen Beveridge, teen librarian.
The competition for teenagers this summer was the brainchild of Anthony Domina, 13, a student at Connellsville Area Junior High School.
“We started with 12 people (teenagers),” Domina said. “Now we are down to three over the five weeks.”
The games have been based on science — Domina's favorite subject and something in which he has proven to be very good. He admits to being first in the Pennsylvania Junior Academy of Science competition.
Domina began work on “Teen Library Survivor” in January.
Different types of games were played on a Friday.
During one week, they played app games. Another week, they had puzzles. Another week brought a zombie competition. During another, they played a forensic science game in which those involved tried to figure out who did it.
For the final competition, the afternoon began with pizza and soft drinks, supplied by Anthony's mother, Stacey Domina. Afterward, the games began.
The last three survivors played a game similar to one older people might know quite well.
“What's ‘Family Feud?' ” asked Shawn Rackner.
The final winner was Austin Beveridge,13, of Connellsville.
Beveridge received a backpack with a book and a water bottle, autographed by Jack Coleman from The Ice Mine.
Domina volunteers extra time at the library. Beveridge said he has put in 10 hours and 38 minutes volunteering for projects not related to the competition.
Karl Polacek is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org or 724-626-3538.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.