Commissioners approve tax plan for South Union plaza
Fayette County commissioners on Tuesday approved a tax increment financing plan for a $24 million shopping plaza to be built adjacent to the Fayette Crossing Shopping Center in South Union.
The plan calls for $73,033 in new taxes generated annually at the county and township levels to be put toward a 20-year loan that the Redevelopment Authority of Fayette County will acquire for site improvements.
The total amount of new taxes to be diverted to the plan over two decades is $965,507, said Andrew P. French, the authority's executive director, in an Aug. 7 memo to commissioners. Cedarwood Development of Akron, Ohio, will invest at least $23 million in the project, according to the memo.
The diverted tax dollars will pay for improvements that include $744,800 in mine remediation, $71,060 in geotechnical services and $149,647 in paving. During the same 20-year period, current taxes totaling $3,348 annually will continue to be paid to the county and township, according to French's memo.
The plan is a revision of an earlier one that included Laurel Highlands School District as a participant. It was revised to exclude the district when its board opted not to allocate any of its portion of new taxes to the project, French's memo states.
Randall J. Hake, Cedarwood's vice president of commercial development, on Tuesday said the plaza will include a Hobby Lobby and Dicks Sporting Goods, among other retail stores and restaurants.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.