Share This Page

Robbery charges dismissed against Uniontown man

| Thursday, Aug. 21, 2014, 4:54 p.m.

Charges against a Uniontown man who was allegedly involved in the robbery of two Connellsville residents at Gibson Terrace were dismissed on Thursday.

Juanya Knopsnider, 18, had been charged with robbery, conspiracy, terroristic threats, reckless endangerment, simple assault, theft by unlawful taking, receiving stolen property, defiant trespass and harassment.

The charges were dropped by District Judge Ronald Haggerty Jr. when the victim did not present himself to testify.

Knopsnider was accused of conspiring with Cody Darrell of Connellsville to rob two people after asking them to play basketball at 10 p.m. June 13 at Gibson Terrace in Connellsville.

According to an affidavit of probable cause, Darrell hit one of the victims and put him in a choke hold at knifepoint and put a gun to the other victim's back and threatened to kill him if he didn't empty his pockets. Knopsnider was present during the robbery.

Police said $170 was stolen from the victims.

Knopsnider was lodged in the Fayette County Prison on $50,000 bail since June 16.

The charges against Darrell were held for county court with his trial scheduled to begin at 8 a.m. Dec. 8 in the Fayette County Courthouse.

Mark Hofmann is a Trib Total Media staff writer. He can be reached at mhofmann@tribweb.com or 724-626-3539.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.